I’m confused. Levi Leipheimer admitted to being a drug cheat and all over the internet I’m reading articles that defend him. I admit to know almost nothing about cycling. But here’s what I wonder.

Lance Armstrong made a lot of money cheating and so did Leipheimer.

So, why is Leipheimer a better guy?

Leipheimer ratted out Armstrong but Armstrong didn’t rat out Leipheimer.

Why does this make Leipheimer a better guy?

Please, would someone better informed than I explain these inconsistencies to me.

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)