Here is a link to my column from the 49ers-Chargers game. The full text runs below:
Colin Kaepernick didn’t play that badly in the 49ers’ third exhibition game. Watching him complete just half his passes, you didn’t want to poke a pencil into your eye or stick your finger down your throat. Give him that.
He threw some good passes. He really did. Early in the second quarter, he went on a roll — sort of. He hit LaMichael (Peanut) James for seven yards, whipped a bullet to Vernon Davis for 16, threw a laser past a defender to Michael Crabtree for 10 and checked down to Bruce Miller for seven yards. Four plays in a row just like that. All of it was nifty work, what you’d expect from the Niners’ starting quarterback, a player who is not yet elite but hopes to be.
That mini-roll gives the team and the fans hope the offense isn’t a dud. The 49ers should have a very good defense, but so far the offense — we’re talking the first-team offense — has verged on dud. Call it dormant with a chance of waking up at a date to be determined.
Take what happened right after Kaepernick’s mini-roll. He handed the ball to running back Carlos Hyde — lots of potential in that guy — and Hyde ran hard up the middle for nine. That put the ball at the 17-yard line of the San Diego Chargers. That put the ball in the red zone, the Niners’ danger zone. What would they ever do?
Here’s what they did. On first down, a defender deflected Kaepernick’s pass to Quinton Patton. On second down, Peanut ran up the middle and lost four. On third down, Kaepernick threw short left to Vance McDonald and missed him. Then the 49ers kicked a field goal. The usual.
After that series, his fourth, the 49ers took Kaepernick out of the game, but not before he reasserted certain truths about his play.
1) He still is no genius in the red zone.
2) He still has thrown no touchdown passes this preseason, as in none.
Why is it bad to throw no TD passes in Exhibition Game 3?
Because Game 3 is the closest to a real game in this silly prelude to the season. Teams do a certain amount of trying. Kaepernick certainly tried to score from the red zone, but couldn’t. Does this mean the 49ers’ offense is no good? It does not mean that. It means it has work to do.
This we do know. Kaepernick’s offensive line — an area of concern for the team — did not protect the rich young quarterback. The Niners have not adequately replaced guard Alex Boone whose holdout has lasted so long it has become a lifestyle. The Niners have not adequately replaced center Jonathan Goodwin, now with the Saints. And right tackle Anthony Davis has played no plays this preseason because of injury.
According to my count, Kaepernick took four big hits in the first three offensive series. Call them brain-rattlers. Once, he fumbled the ball but the officials didn’t call it a fumble. Then he took another rattler and fumbled for real and the Chargers recovered.
I believe Jim Harbaugh would have left Kaepernick and the first-string offense in longer than four series so it actually could score a touchdown. But he was scared stiff Kaepernick would get murdered before the sellout crowd and, although scoring a TD would be good for the morale of the offense, instant death to Kaepernick would be a blow to the team’s collective ego.
When Kaepernick left the game, his passer rating was 64.2, a substandard number. By comparison, San Diego’s Philip Rivers had a rating of 135.4, twice as good as Kaepernick’s.
Numbers can be inconclusive and it’s not the aim of this column to say Kaepernick is a 64.2 guy. But for what it’s worth — and it’s worth something — the 49ers’ offense under Kaepernick did not improve this preseason. Come to think of it, he didn’t improve either.
It’s easy and almost irrelevant to argue whether Blaine Gabbert is a suitable backup quarterback. Gabbert played well enough on Sunday — 110.4 passer rating. But he is someone you write about and talk about and think about only in preseason. He is not the starting quarterback. Kaepernick is. Kaepernick matters to the future of the 49ers and Gabbert does not. And Kaepernick has been no big deal through three games.
Afterward, Kaepernick came to the interview auditorium where he spoke for about three minutes.
Q: How do you evaluate the first-team offense?
A: We have some things to improve on before we get to the season.
Q: Such as?
Q: You didn’t have a lot of time to throw. What was the issue?
A: Execution. We have good plays. We just didn’t execute.
At which point, I chimed in, “You said it’s execution. Is this about average for how you execute in the third game? Are you beyond what you usually do or maybe a little behind?
Kaepernick: That’s tough to say. I don’t know what the standard would be to say whether we’re better or not.
Cohn: But you play. I don’t play. You must actually be aware of the standard.
Kaepernick: To our standards?
Kaepernick: This was below.
Cohn: Does that concern you?
Kaepernick: No, it’s preseason.
What did we learn from this little dialogue which we can only describe as football meets postmodernism? I’m thinking Harold Pinter or Samuel Beckett. We learned Kaepernick doesn’t like to give a straight answer to a straight question. We learned he will give a straight answer if you persist, if you wade through the verbal obstacles. He finally admitted the offense is below standard.
We appreciate Kaepernick’s candor. We admire how he says much in few words. We call this verbal “precision,” one of Harbaugh’s favorite words. We say Kaepernick’s play must be as precise as his talking — fast, careful economical, sharp, to the point, no wasted effort.
When Kaepernick plays like he talks, he and the offense will be season ready. Execution.
For more on the world of sports in general and the Bay Area in particular, go to the Cohn Zohn at cohn.blogs.pressdemocrat.com. You can reach Staff Columnist Lowell Cohn at email@example.com.